The exclusion of the navigation bar allows Lite to offer more room leading to easier navigation. You can simply swipe right or left to toggle among them. Messenger Lite, however, ditches almost all of these extra features and focuses on three simple buttons at the top for H ome, Contacts, and Profile. This makes the whole chatting experience unintuitive.
Messages, Active, Groups, and Calls buttons are at the top along with the search bar and the Me bubble for the user profile. The navigation bar at the bottom comprises buttons for Home, Contacts, Camera, Games, and Bots. The Messenger app looks cramped up with several action buttons. One of the main difference between the two apps is the user interface (UI). The average memory usage is around 187MB for the Facebook Messenger while the Messenger Lite uses just 46MB of memory. On the other hand, Messenger Lite takes up a total space of just over 25MB, out of which the app size is 20.20MB and the user data is over 3MB. The Messenger takes up total 199MB data, out of which the app size itself is 139MB while the user data is 59.72MB. Storage and Memory Consumptionįacebook’s original messenger app multiplies in size and consumes more storage over a period of time.
Other Stories: Facebook Messenger vs Google Hangouts: Which Is Better for Communication? 1. Let’s take a look at a few major differences between Facebook Messenger and Messenger Lite. It’s a stripped down version of the Messenger that sports the basic features only. Lite has been available for a while in India and Africa and was recently launched in four additional countries. Facebook’s very own Lite version of the messenger app is getting popular on app stores. Fortunately, there is an alternative called Messenger Lite.
All these features make up a heavier Messenger app that gets sluggish at times.
0 kommentar(er)
